To Tithe or Not to Tithe
April 29th, 2010Modern preachers have twisted the concept of tithing. I’m not a Biblical scholar, but I am offering my two cents worth.
Here is a brief overview of the history of tithing.
In the Old Testament, a man was commanded to tithe on his INCREASE. I will begin with an example. Suppose a man counts his sheep on the first day of the calendar year. For the sake of argument, let’s use the U.S. calendar and call this
Jauaary 1st. Let’s call this farmer “Abraham,” and let’s say on January 1st he owns 100 sheep. He tends to his sheep
throughout the year, and counts them again on December 31st. Let’s suppose he now owns 110 sheep. His increase for this calendar year would be 10 sheep. His tithe would be one sheep. Now I’m not a bean counter, so I can’t tell you the effect of sin offerings or gifts to neighbors. We can agree, however, that Abraham gained 10 sheep and should tithe one sheep. Also remember that this tithe will be presented by the priest. He will invite the poor to eat with him, so it is basically a feast (much like Americans do for Thanksgiving or Christmas–except this meal is eaten by the priest, his family, and a group of poor (perhaps homeless) people.
Let’s fast-forward to the New Testament. Jesus did not use the words “tithe” or “tithing” very much. In my concordance (the 1980 version of Abington’s Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible), the word “tithes” is only used 5 times in the New Testament. If tithing were a pillar of Christian belief, would it not be mentioned numerous times (e.g words like “love” or “faith”)?
What does the New Testament say about tithing? Here are a few examples. In Luke 18: 10 – 14, we read the story about the pharisee and the tax collector. The Jews despised tax collectors. These people represented the evil arm of the government. In addition to carrying out the decrees of the governor, tax collectors often “helped themselves” with “bonuses.” I have no idea what kind of salary they were paid (probably much less than modern IRS agents). Still, Jesus could see through to the heart of these individuals. The two characters in the story, of course, were types (archetypes, if you will). If Jesus were alive today, he might have given them names to make the story seem more real. Before I explain the relevance of this story, I feel the need to mention two more references. In Mark 12:41 – 44, Jesus is watching the offering plate being passed (in the modern parlance). Jesus compares the widow’s sacrifice to that of others. He says she gave more (proportionately) than others. And in Matthew 21:13, Jesus goes into the temple and drives out the “money changers.” In those days, the priests made money by buying and selling sheep (and other animals used for sacrifice). Basically, a sheep was supposed to be without blemish. The priests, being the “inspectors,” would make a determination as to the suitability of each sacrifice. A sheep was supposed to be sacrificed from one’s personal “stock”–something near and dear to the believer. If a man travelled a long way to the temple and then
found out his sacrifice was “unacceptable,” the priest would conveniently have a “perfect” animal for sale. Jesus realized the priests were taking advantage of the people, and He was incensed.
What do these three New Testament stories have in common? Jesus was saying “it is time to get down to the heart of the matter.” The Pharisees were not bad people. In fact, they had high moral standards. The problem was they had achieved a clean lifestyle. I know, there were exceptions. A few committed adultery. Others had two sets of weights for their scales (one set for buying and another set for selling). And they were great at finding loopholes in the law (like throwing a sandal off the back of the wagon every mile or so to void the “leaving home” clause). But it would be unfair to call these behaviors typical. The pharisees took responsibility for their actions (for the most part). If a man got a woman pregnant, he would provide for his child. By today’s standards, a pharisee would be a saint.
Why was Jesus so hard on the pharisees? There were several reasons. Basically, they trusted in their own righteousness. They were good people, and they knew it. The pharisees understood the system, and they used their influence to advance their own agendas. Unfortunately, they became smug. They worked hard and prospered, but they gave credit to themselves. They advanced the concept of “God helps those who help themselves.” They honestly believed they were blessed because they deserved it. More on this subject later.
What is the New Testament rule on tithing? Here’s the rub. Jesus did not create a new set of rules. He created a New Covenant, but He did not create a new set of rules. He wrote a new “constitution” or sorts. Jesus came to earth to teach us how to love one another. Jesus called “love” the greatest (highest) law. He was about compassion. He told a pharisee that he “should” tithe (Matthew 23:23). Why? This pharisee had money. By contrast, He didn’t think the widow (Mark chapter 12) should tithe. Jesus had common sense. He understood dirt poor people cannot afford to tithe. What is the rule? Begin with common sense. If your refrigerator is empty, you don’t need to drop $100 in the offering plate.
Remember, the book of Malachi was written approximately 400 years before Jesus was born. When a church is experiencing financial difficulty, the preacher may decide to preach from Malachi. We’ve all heard the sermons about “robbing God.” Ironically, Jesus never preached on the book of Malachi. Rather, it was His mission to remove our “heart of stone” and replace it with a “heart of flesh” (Ezekiel 36:26).



